Refer to http://groups.google.com/group/ebean/browse_thread/thread/eab9503892b33e93
So my question is: is it intented, that schema/catalog in
NamingConvention are completely ignored, if a @Table-annotation for
the beanclasses is given?
well I think the NamingConvention should always have highest priority
and be able to ignore annotations. I think we initially had it working
like that and then there were some changes made that may have bypassed
the naming convention - it consider such behaviour as a bug.